Showing posts with label Kerfuffle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kerfuffle. Show all posts
Monday, October 6, 2008
Thursday, October 2, 2008
"Is Obama's new faux-presidential, alternative-reality seal his 'Mission Accomplished'?"
¿La bandera "Mission Accomplished" no era eficaz?
Tuesday, June 3, 2008
"So Indiana may end up being the tiebreaker."
Is Obama a leftist or just inexperienced? Prof. Althouse puzzles through this question with the help of the balanced panel of John Hinderacker, Ed Morissey, Glenn Reynolds and Mickey Kaus (whose piece she particularly likes).
Saturday, May 24, 2008
Friday, May 23, 2008
Hillary Clinton wants the Democratic Party to check into the irregulaties in the Texas caucuses.
Caucuses suck. My theory on Prof. Althouse's hostility to caucus is that her son is involved and he thinks his side is getting screwed. Of course it could be because his side is getting screwed and he is actually able to give her insight into that.
Prof. Althouse's evolution on the Wright controversy interests me. She was late to the party and apparently didn't think much of it initially, (her first post on the subject was the first time I gave a "Obama Positive" rating), then she received an email in the middle of the night from one of her favorite commenters, then she derided Obama's explanation of the relationship and how he sought to move on. Now "the association with Jeremiah Wright should trouble us." (italics in original)
Prof. Althouse's evolution on the Wright controversy interests me. She was late to the party and apparently didn't think much of it initially, (her first post on the subject was the first time I gave a "Obama Positive" rating), then she received an email in the middle of the night from one of her favorite commenters, then she derided Obama's explanation of the relationship and how he sought to move on. Now "the association with Jeremiah Wright should trouble us." (italics in original)
Labels:
Clinton Positive,
Kerfuffle,
Obama negative,
Wright
Race and religion, Barack Obama and Clarence Thomas.
Prof. Althouse quotes at length from an email from an email from one of her most favored commenters. The commenter is not an Obama fan and (at least to me) that comes through in the email. It doesn't mean that Prof. Althouse is negative on Obama (though I have a hard time seeing her giving a pro-Obama email from a commenter similar prominence with so little comment {in large part I don't know that there are any pro-Obama commenters who are in her good graces).
Labels:
commenters,
Kerfuffle,
Obama neutral,
Wright
Friday, May 16, 2008
"I don’t think it is fair to suggest somehow that we have been trying to hide the bone on this."
Prof. Althouse links to a story on the Obama/Rezko matter. The post itself is neutral and so that is how I am labeling it.
That said, it will be interesting to see how much Prof. Althouse posts "neutral" posts about matters which are clearly negatives for the other candidates.
That said, it will be interesting to see how much Prof. Althouse posts "neutral" posts about matters which are clearly negatives for the other candidates.
Labels:
fun with language,
Kerfuffle,
Obama neutral,
Rezko
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)