Thursday, October 9, 2008
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
Monday, October 6, 2008
End of July numbers
Here are the numbers from the time of the vow until the end of July.
McCain negative (5)(6%)
McCain Neutral (71)(82%)
McCain Positive (11)(13%)
Obama ignored (1)(0%)
Obama negative (42)(15%)
Obama neutral (223)(81%)
Obama Positive (10) (4%)
Here are the numbers just for July
McCain negative (0)(0%)
McCain Neutral (19)(90%)
McCain Positive (2)(10%)
Obama negative (7)(13%)
Obama neutral (46)(82%)
Obama Positive (3) (5%)
McCain negative (5)(6%)
McCain Neutral (71)(82%)
McCain Positive (11)(13%)
Obama ignored (1)(0%)
Obama negative (42)(15%)
Obama neutral (223)(81%)
Obama Positive (10) (4%)
Here are the numbers just for July
McCain negative (0)(0%)
McCain Neutral (19)(90%)
McCain Positive (2)(10%)
Obama negative (7)(13%)
Obama neutral (46)(82%)
Obama Positive (3) (5%)
"A smooth-talking rookie senator with an exotic name passes himself off as the incumbent American president to credulous foreigners."
It is tough not to say "negative" when Prof. Althouse is so dismissive about people who she thinks are fawning over Obama.
Labels:
McCain Neutral,
media,
NYTimes,
Obama negative
"End of the Affair: Barack Obama and the press break up."
Great then I don't have to hear about how the media wants Obama to win anymore?
"And it came to pass, in the eighth year of the reign of the evil Bush the Younger (The Ignorant). . .
Too much deification can make you sick.
Michelle Obama's "combination of bitterness, ingratitude, anti-Americanism, leftism, and, yes, elitism rubs a lot of people the wrong way.
Because if you want to stay neutral you should quote a lot of the guys from National Review.
Joe Klein's scurrilous meltdown.
The purpose of the surge was to create space for political progress in Iraq. That progress has not manifested itself. It is pre-mature to say the surge was a success when measured against its stated goals.
Labels:
Iraq,
joe klein,
McCain Positive,
Obama negative
"If I were sitting in a Tube train and all the people opposite me were reading 'Mein Kampf' with obvious enjoyment and approval. . ."
1978. But the quote is relevant to Obama.
"Who they choose as their president is the American's business. But it's the business of Iraqis to say what they want.
Timelines. Prof. Althouse is neutral. She criticizes the pro-Obama argument and let's the pro-McCain argument stand without comment.
What has Obama said about Iraq?
The surge has been a great success (so long as we don't pay attention to the expressed goals of the surge)! How can Obama not acknowledge his idiocy in not supporting the surge?
Yesterday, "The Daily Show" and Rush Limbaugh ran with the same joke about the Obama cartoon.
But, wait, I thought Stewart couldn't crack jokes because he wanted Obama to win.
Labels:
comedy,
instapundit,
media,
Obama neutral,
Rush Limbaugh
The Bob Dylan song that turned on Jimmy Carter is the one that Barack Obama calls a favorite.
Why does Obama say he likes the things he says he likes?
Why can't we joke about Obama?
Either because all the joke writers want Obama to win or because conservatives are completely humorless and can't write satire. No other options are possible.
Is Obama "trying to deflect attention from his own poor surge judgment . . ."
Porque el juicio de Kaus ha sido siempre bueno.
So here's the new New Yorker cover.
{Paraphrasing} Prof. Althouse: Of course Obama can't joke about being a violent black nationalist Muslim, bin Laden lover who heats his house with burning American flags. On the other hand, maybe he should joke about it.
She also frontpages a bunch of commenters who think Obama is too dour because he can't laugh at the "Obama is a terrorist loving muslim meme."
She also frontpages a bunch of commenters who think Obama is too dour because he can't laugh at the "Obama is a terrorist loving muslim meme."
Obama chides Bernie Mac.
"So, one hoe says to the other. . ."
Labels:
comedy,
commenters,
Ed Morissey,
feminism,
Obama neutral
Bernard-Henri Levy says why Barack Obama will be President.
"Can you get things wrong with questions? Why, yes you can!" Duly noted.
Saturday, October 4, 2008
"Obama's ample self-regard is lapsing into hubris."
On the one hand, Prof. Althouse likes the kids; on the other had she thinks Obama is being disingenuous.
Friday, October 3, 2008
There's something about Jesse.
I'll play along with the charade. There doesn't seem to be a reason to change
Obama echoes the phrase that made me turn against Kerry.
There's something happening here, what it is ain't exactly clear.
"It was a time of uncertainty, hope and change. The summer of love."
Obama is a hippie.
Labels:
ads,
McCain Neutral,
Obama neutral,
youtube
"Sorry to be crude, but does the NYT realize that we may be at the point where reports of millitary success in Iraq help Obama . . ."
Kaus dice que el éxito es malo para McCain.
Labels:
conspiracy,
Iraq,
kaus,
NYTimes,
Obama neutral
The pro-McCain argument that older is better.
Age is just a number but that number can be a concern.
John McCain says: "I hate the bloggers."
Prof. Althouse thinks McCain is kidding, though she does seem just a tad miffed that she has gotten crossed off his list.
Labels:
Blogging about blogging,
McCain Neutral,
youtube
The Saturday vlog.
How Obama could lose Prof. Althouse.
Labels:
McCain Neutral,
Obama neutral,
prosecution of Bush,
youtube
The NYT wants "change it can believe in" - and it can't believe this new Barack Obama .
Pissing the Times off gets you bonus points.
Should McCain be asked how his experience in Vietnam qualifies him to be President?
My mom doesn't always agree with me either. (Or am I misreading something here.)
Labels:
JAC,
McCain Neutral,
media,
Obama neutral,
war hero
Barack Obama "is supposed to be the tonic for the culture wars of the 60s."
Vietnam! Because Obama's campaign is really bad at strategy.
Labels:
commenters,
dowd,
instapundit,
Obama neutral,
webb
Should a man wear a tie the color of his wife's outfit . . . even when the color is orange?"
Ties go to the runner. Prof. Althouse seems snarkier towards Obama than to McCain but I can't call it negative.
Labels:
fashion,
McCain Neutral,
Obama neutral,
spouses
End of June numbers
Here are the cumulative numbers from the time of the vow to the end of June.
McCain negative (5)(8%)
McCain Neutral (52)(79%)
McCain Positive (9)(14%)
Obama ignored (1) (0%)
Obama negative (35)(16%)
Obama neutral (177)(80%)
Obama Positive (7) (3%)
{Percentages do not total to 100%, sue me.} I no longer am going to track Prof. Althouse's stance on the Clinton candidacy.
Here are the totals just for June:
McCain negative (1)(5%)
McCain Neutral (20)(91%)
McCain Positive (1)(5%)
Obama negative (4)(10%)
Obama neutral (35)(85%)
Obama Positive (2) (5%)
McCain negative (5)(8%)
McCain Neutral (52)(79%)
McCain Positive (9)(14%)
Obama ignored (1) (0%)
Obama negative (35)(16%)
Obama neutral (177)(80%)
Obama Positive (7) (3%)
{Percentages do not total to 100%, sue me.} I no longer am going to track Prof. Althouse's stance on the Clinton candidacy.
Here are the totals just for June:
McCain negative (1)(5%)
McCain Neutral (20)(91%)
McCain Positive (1)(5%)
Obama negative (4)(10%)
Obama neutral (35)(85%)
Obama Positive (2) (5%)
"Obama's Katrina: The most damaging article about Barack Obama I've read."
Kaus piensa que Obama está en apuro y un slumlord.
Bill said Obama would have to quote kiss my ass close quote, if he wants his support."
Giving everyone to parse every word Bill says for months.
Ed Morrissey is flat wrong when he says that Obama contradicted himself about the DC gun case.
The nuance of flipflopping on guns.
Labels:
Ed Morissey,
guns,
Obama neutral,
pragmatism,
youtube
"As always with Obama, it's a question of who the rubes really are. It's the power of glamour.
You got a problem with Rube Goldberg? Heh, indeed.
Labels:
bitter,
instapundit,
Obama neutral,
pragmatism
Krauthammer frets about Obama's flipflops.
Pragmatic summer footwear.
Labels:
Greenwald,
Krauthammer,
Obama Positive,
Olbermann,
pragmatism
McCain strikes a pose.
Come on Vogue! It is better than superimposing his image on her Justify my Love video.
The Supreme Court on campaign finance, and John McCain on the Supreme Court.
The kinds of judges McCain would appoint don't like the kinds of laws that McCain proposes.
Thursday, October 2, 2008
McCain on the child rape/death penalty case. UPDATE: Obama opposes the decision too!
Prof. Althouse assumes McCain's opposition is genuine. She suggests Obama's might be political.
I got completely distracted by Marilyn Monroe.
I got completely distracted by Prof. Althouse getting completely distracted by Marilyn Monroe.
"Is Obama's new faux-presidential, alternative-reality seal his 'Mission Accomplished'?"
¿La bandera "Mission Accomplished" no era eficaz?
Is feminism about defending women from criticism?
Interesting question. "Women in politics are subject to attacks, as are male politicians, and they aren't going to succeed by arguing that the attacks are sexist. Get to the point and tell us why the attacks are wrong. . . The fact is, Americans feel much freer to disrespect white men — and this is not a disadvantage for white men. This is part of being viewed as strong and powerful. So be strong and powerful, quit whining, and fight." You know, I am about to watch the VP debate in a few hours.
"Just try to imagine Mister Rogers playing the agent Ari in 'Entourage' and it all falls into place ."
I have been meaning to rent "Entourage" and now I need to to understand the election. I actually think Prof. Althouse is fine with this tactic (or is it a strategy).
What "privleges" would Barack Obama give to the Guantanamo detainees?
Barack Obama is just like Rush Limbaugh. Prof. Althouse wants precision out of the candidates, well at least from Obama.
"I was discriminated against by the very person who was supposed to be bringing this change, who I could really relate to."
Prof. Althouse seems sensitive to a tough situation.
Moderating Michelle -- Michelle Obama to go on "The View" today. UPDATE: I live-blog the show.
Just like meet the press. Here is a question, if Prof. Althouse is positive toward a spouse, is she positive toward the candidate? I am saying no.
Labels:
ambiguity,
media,
NYTimes,
Obama neutral,
spouses
"Swiftboating Obama."
Talking about the important things.
Labels:
Blogging about blogging,
media,
NYTimes,
Obama neutral
Would Obama handle "terrorism simply as a matter of law enforcement"?
The American legal tradition is for wusses. This one is close to "Obama negative" but I am calling it neutral because, well damnit I can't really say why.
Labels:
ambiguity,
McCain Neutral,
Obama neutral,
terrorism
"Obama's new anti-smear website . . . It's the new go to spot for dirt on Obama."
Kaus utiliza la información de Obama contra Obama.
I am marking this Obama negative because Prof. Althouse seems disappointed that there has been no dirt provided in the last week. If she wants more dirt on Obama, she is not neutral, right? I suppose that she could want the dirt just to have bloggable material.
I am marking this Obama negative because Prof. Althouse seems disappointed that there has been no dirt provided in the last week. If she wants more dirt on Obama, she is not neutral, right? I suppose that she could want the dirt just to have bloggable material.
"The hole in your heart when you don't have a male figure in the home who can guide you and lead you."
"But I can't think of any time in my life when I've felt so awful about the death of a single individual I'd never met."
Prof. Althouse links to one of her sons reflections on the passing of Tim Russert. In the process, her son mentions McCain's drift to the right to pursue the Republican nomination.
So this is Russert's last interview? Who is the last person he names?
Joe Biden.
Prof. Althouse: "I almost want Barack Obama to pick Joe Biden [as VP]... and John McCain to pick Lindsey Graham... as a tribute to our great journalist Tim."
So, Obama listens to Prof. Althouse's almost impassioned plea while McCain ignores her request. Is that enough to tip the scales of neutrality?
Prof. Althouse: "I almost want Barack Obama to pick Joe Biden [as VP]... and John McCain to pick Lindsey Graham... as a tribute to our great journalist Tim."
So, Obama listens to Prof. Althouse's almost impassioned plea while McCain ignores her request. Is that enough to tip the scales of neutrality?
Labels:
biden,
graham,
McCain Neutral,
media,
Obama neutral
Wednesday, October 1, 2008
Jim . . . dimmed.
Prof. Althouse links with no commentary to a story about Jim Johnson resigning from Obama's VP selection committee. No commentary so it has to be neutral, right? But how many times does she link to stories about concerns about the people and lobbyists around McCain. I'll call it neutral for now.
"Selcet from the numerous web, blog, listed here, go there, and make your opinions supporting John McCain known."
Speaking from the future it is easy to look at this as an attempt to troll the lefty sites. At the time I bet is was more an attempt to shore up support from conservative sites and, perhaps, pick off a few stray Clinton supporters at Kos (though there would have been better places to do that [e.g MyDD, TalkLeft]).
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
"She said the words, but she didn't endorse Obama."
And if she had mentioned Obama's name only once they would say that was proof positive that she didn't support him.
Labels:
McCain Neutral,
Obama neutral,
Rush Limbaugh
Monday, September 29, 2008
"Barack Obama sought the New Party's endorsement knowing it was a radical left organization."
The words in the post are ambiguous or neutral. But how many times does Prof. Althouse link to memes from far left blogs when they touch on things that concern her about McCain?
What exactly is Hillary Clinton going to say after the last primary is over?
Can we hope that it is "My husband is a pompous ass?"
"The harmony that existed between MyDD and Kos since the birth of the Netroots no longer exists today."
If Jerome Armstrong fell in the woods would anyone hear it?
Labels:
Blogging about blogging,
Clinton Neutral,
Kos
The rumored videotape of Michelle Obama.
The polls just closed in Puerto Rico.
I was (not) born in Puerto Rico
Labels:
Clinton Neutral,
McCain Neutral,
Obama neutral,
process
McCain in '08! McCain in '08! . . No-Bama! No-Bama!
I'll take cheers heard at Auburn for $350, Alex.
Labels:
Clinton Neutral,
McCain Neutral,
Obama neutral,
process,
youtube
Saturday, September 27, 2008
End of May numbers
These are cumulative from the time of the vow of cruel neutrality until May 31.
• Clinton Negative (17)
• Clinton Neutral (103)
• Clinton Positive (8)
• McCain negative (4)
• McCain Neutral (32)
• McCain Positive (8)
• Obama ignored (1)
• Obama negative (31)
• Obama neutral (142)
• Obama Positive (5)
• Clinton Negative (17)
• Clinton Neutral (103)
• Clinton Positive (8)
• McCain negative (4)
• McCain Neutral (32)
• McCain Positive (8)
• Obama ignored (1)
• Obama negative (31)
• Obama neutral (142)
• Obama Positive (5)
"Oh, damn. Where did you come from?"
Nothing funnier than a white catholic priest preaching to a predominantly black protestant congregation.
Labels:
Clinton Neutral,
Obama neutral,
Pfleger,
race
"Oh, this is so terrible . . ."
Here's a hypothetical (perhaps more properly -- counterfactual), if Bill Clinton did not exist and somehow Hillary Clinton had arrived at this place in history, how much would have that changed Prof. Althouse's view of Hillary Clinton.
"Does Senator Clinton understand how tasteless -- even how ghoulish -- it is to use the word 'assassination'?"
Ghouls? Reminds me, Halloween is coming up.
Obama "looks like his own Secret Service agent."
Future's so bright I got to wear shades.
Labels:
Clinton Neutral,
fashion,
McCain Neutral,
Obama neutral
Hillary Clinton and the non-apology.
Parsing apologies of sociopaths.
Labels:
Andrew Sullivan,
Clinton Negative,
Obama neutral
Friday, September 26, 2008
"If Golda Meir . . ."
Senator, I knew Golda Meir. Golda Meir was a friend of mine. Senator you are no Golda Meir.
The Obama and Clinton campaigns are in "formal talks" about a VP slot for Hillary?
Methinks Prof. Althouse is not a big fan of Hillary.
"The fate of the world for the next four years. It's all going to boil down to a few old Jews in Century Village."
If it is only four years, is it really that fateful.
"How do you respond to a sociopath like this?"
Saying that Clinton is not a sociopath or insane is not really too positive.
Labels:
Andrew Sullivan,
Clinton Neutral,
Obama neutral,
process
The absolutely insane talk of Obama promising Hillary Clinton the next seat on the Supreme Court.
Here is one way for Obama to lose Prof. Althouse.
"On a gorgeous, unseasonably mild day in Portland, a free performance by a hugely successful local band is likely to draw a huge crowd."
Prof. Althouse is wrong. I am sure that no one would have showed up for the Obama speech if the band hadn't been there. Just as no one would have shown up for Palin in Florida if it wasn't for Aaron Tippin.
Is Barack Obama "a walking, talking gaffe machine"?
Prof. Althouse gets sent on a wild goose chase by Malkin and finds a new appreciation for Obama.
"With each passing day, it seems a little less likely that the next president of the United States will wear a skirt. . ."
Prof. Althouse: "I have always resisted the efforts to get women jazzed up about the idea of a woman President. But for those who did get absorbed into that idiotic emotional manipulation, there is now the need to work toward closure."
I f Hillary is not to be the first woman President, is there a woman President on the horizon?
Palin is mentioned in the comments.
Robin Givhan on Cindy McCain and Michelle Obama in Vogue
More important stuff.
Labels:
family,
fashion,
McCain Neutral,
Obama neutral
Obama on the flag pin: "If it ends up being on another suit, I might leave it one day . . ."
Now we get to the important stuff. Unless lying is good, this is negative.
After the California decision, will same-sex marriage become an issue in the presidential campaign?
Maybe Nader was right, all the candidates are the same.
Labels:
Clinton Neutral,
gays,
judges,
McCain Neutral,
Obama neutral
Thursday, September 25, 2008
Thanks to all the commenters who kept up . . .
A few most favored commenters are anti-Obama and/or pro-Clinton (including one of Prof. Althouse's sons) but Prof. Althouse does not endorse the views.
Ron Paul supporters plan "an embarassing public revolt against" McCain for the Republican Convention.
Ron Paul is relevant? Ron Paul is relevant!
Some of us like to think the Muslim world would love President Obama
I wonder if Prof. Althouse is one of some of us.
Michelle won't let Barack pick Hillary as VP.
Novak must have good sources in the Obama camp. Or maybe he and Rush Limbaugh are speculating.
Labels:
Clinton Negative,
family,
Obama neutral,
Rush Limbaugh
Obama insinuated that McCain is senile, and the wily McCain took advantage.
Prof. Althouse insinuated that Obama is senile.
Labels:
age,
McCain Positive,
Obama negative,
temper
"I've been to 57 states."
Obama is bad at math, civics or both. Prof. Althouse notes: "Who's losing it now?" But has she (since her vow of cruel neutrality) been negative toward McCain for "losing it"?
If John McCain said, 'I got the white vote, baby! His candidacy would be over."
Unmatched quotation marks! (Sorry, flashback to proof-reading days.)
Let's judge Hillary Clinton's executive aptitude by the campaign she managed.
Prof. Althouse says: "We should the candidates' aptitude by the campaigns they managed." Hmm, speaking from the future, I am not sure Prof. Althouse still holds that view. We will see.
Hillary Clinton's best argument to the superdelegates.
Because superdelegates should not be suspicious of Karl Rove's motives.
A new bloggingheads!
I didn't re-watch the Bloggingheads episode with Prof. Althouse and Jeralyn Merritt, but the post is neutral.
McCain's judges.
Judge not lest ye be judged. Prof. Althouse is pretty complimentary of McCain's statement about judges but not (in my view) so effusive to be "positive". Similarly, she notes Obama's approach to judges (specifically she brings up Obama's vote on Roberts which she does not like) but stays {again, in my view} neutral
"Big ball, our Matt."
Balls that are held for pleasure are the balls that I like best. (I'll take misheard lyrics for $1,000, Alex.}
Labels:
Andrew Sullivan,
Drudge,
Obama neutral,
process
The NYT does not say it's time for Hillary Clinton to bow out.
Tough to figure whether Prof. Althouse wants the primary to continue more or not.
Labels:
Clinton Neutral,
NYTimes,
Obama neutral,
process
"We now know who the Democratic nominee will be."
Finally! {Oh wait, you mean it is not over yet . . .}
"Michelle Obama seethes with bitterness."
Prof. Althouse seems neutral about perceptions of Michelle Obama, but she sure links to a lot of people who don't like Mrs. Obama.
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Hillary Clinton: "I'm not going to put in my lot with economists."
I might be wrong but idiocy is not a compliment.
"It's the fact that he grew up in Hawaii, and I think he can make change."
Brother, can you spare a dime.
"People, people . . . Please keep the comments civil."
A plea that could be used at Prof. Althouse's place.
Suddenly -- and sensibly -- the Dems want on Fox News.
Clinton came off well because she is a jerk. {Not my thought, O'Reilly's.}
Baptist minister talks dirty to John McCain
Wherein I learn that trollop and cunt are pet names. I'll have to try that sometime.
The "long and painful falling out" between Barack Obama and Jeremiah Wright - and what made Obama snap
Obama snaps against Wright, but for the wrong reasons.
"President Bush has f------- everything up so much, he’s even made it hard for a white man to become president!”
Prof. Althouse doesn't think Chris Rock is that funny. But is he right?
"Where, when he could have used them, were Obama's oh-so-famous endorsers?"
Prof. Althouse reflects on those who stood silent while Obama got attacked.
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
End of April Summary
At the end of April:
Clinton Negative (7) (8%)
Clinton Neutral (73) (84%)
Clinton Positive (7)(8%)
McCain negative (4) (12%)
McCain Neutral (23) (70%)
McCain Positive (6)(18%)
Obama ignored (1) (1%)
Obama negative (26) (21%)
Obama neutral (93) (76%)
Obama Positive (3)(2%)
To put it in some perspective, Prof. Althouse (from her vow of cruel neutrality until the end of April) had almost as many posts about Rev. Wright (28) as she did about Sen. McCain (33).
Clinton Negative (7) (8%)
Clinton Neutral (73) (84%)
Clinton Positive (7)(8%)
McCain negative (4) (12%)
McCain Neutral (23) (70%)
McCain Positive (6)(18%)
Obama ignored (1) (1%)
Obama negative (26) (21%)
Obama neutral (93) (76%)
Obama Positive (3)(2%)
To put it in some perspective, Prof. Althouse (from her vow of cruel neutrality until the end of April) had almost as many posts about Rev. Wright (28) as she did about Sen. McCain (33).
"Can you believe this Reverend Wright guy?" BIll O'Reilly asks Hillary Clinton
Being a jerk is good to O'Reilly, neutral to Prof. Althouse.
Thoughts on reading the transcript of Barack Obama's press conference about Jeremiah Wright.
Prof. Althouse seems to not believe Obama's divorce from Wright and tries to deconstruct his press conference on Wright.
Why Christopher Hitchens tries never to wear a tie.
I am curious why Prof. Alhouse tries never to wear a tie.
Jeremiah Wright is not lying low.
Speaking here onlyas someone who is blogging about blogging about (now mainly) Wright: Dear Reverend Wright, please shut up.
Obama needs to "stop citing . . .
¿Kaus, puede darme a perma-link, por favor? ¿Kaus esta negativo, podemos decir iguales sobre Prof. Althouse?
Hillary Clinton is a schoolyard bully.
Obama is a sissy. That is not good, right?
Labels:
Clinton Neutral,
commenters,
debates,
Obama negative
"If McCain doesn't win, it will mean that no one born in the 1930s will ever have been President."
Maybe they were to depressed to create great leaders.
"Hamas has said they want Barack Obama to win."
Because we should always believe what Hamas says and let them decide how U.S. citizens should vote.
"Obama, can this really be your friend . . ."
This one is a tough one to categorize. Prof. Althouse links to a Dylan-esque parody lampooning Obama. Prof. Althouse has an affinity for Dylan, she is clearly concerned about many of the connections that the parody highlights but she throws in the fact that if it weren't for her vow of cruel neutrality "I might rank him first of the 3 imperfect characters we [must] choose from."
"Manipulative, Shameful, Race-Baiting."
John McCain is not that bright.
Labels:
McCain negative,
media,
NYTimes,
Obama neutral,
race,
Wright
Mocking Hillary is not sexist -- and it is not good feminism to think it is.
Prof. Althouse: We should be irreverent and unafraid.
"So the truth about the super delegates is . . ."
Kaus dice "the superdelgates" quisiera que Obama ganara porque prefieren McCain a Clinton. (Or at least that is what I think he is saying.)
Labels:
ambiguity,
Clinton Neutral,
kaus,
Kos,
Obama neutral,
process
Tuesday, September 16, 2008
"Why can't Clinton close the deal?"
Deal or no deal?
Labels:
Clinton Neutral,
Kos,
Obama neutral,
process
"It will give Clinton just the tinsiest sliver of an argument that she should not drop out."
Nothing is as much as blowing Sullivan some grief.
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
Here's the post about the Pennsylvania primary
Yes, Mellencamp lives in (near actually) Bloomington.
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
"Hillary's voter base consists of middle-aged to elderly white women who identify with her caustic, stubborn, bulldog resilience."
Being negative toward candidate's supporters is not the same as being negative toward the candidate.
"Historians are generally ambivalent over whether hot-tempered leaders have fared any worse than the placid."
Obama, too cool. McCain, too hot. Goldilocks in a pantsuit, just right.
Labels:
Clinton Positive,
McCain negative,
Obama negative,
temper
Frank Rich and Maureen Dowd get around to the subject of the Clinton-Obama debate.
On the substance, it is hard for me to tell where Prof. Althouse is criticizing Obama and where she is critiquing Rich and Dowd in their defense of Obama.
"The Monongahela River, which runs cleaner than when they were young (not a good sign)..."
Obama visits Pennsylvania.
Prof. Althouse asks: "Why don't environmentalists celebrate economic recessions?" I answer: "For the same reason anti-abortionists don't celebrate single mothers working two jobs and still facing obstacles that appear to be insurmountable. It is tough to sell people on the hard work that is going to take place because of the hard decisions that are to be made. Much easier to sell them on pretty pictures."
Prof. Althouse asks: "Why don't environmentalists celebrate economic recessions?" I answer: "For the same reason anti-abortionists don't celebrate single mothers working two jobs and still facing obstacles that appear to be insurmountable. It is tough to sell people on the hard work that is going to take place because of the hard decisions that are to be made. Much easier to sell them on pretty pictures."
What was the biggest lie at the Clinton-Obama debate?
The media lies and Clinton cops to having lied
Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Slate's anti-Obama ad.
Giving Hillary the finger. According to Prof. Althouse, yes he is. And he promised to be a new kind of politician, tsk tsk.
Hillary Clinton "needs to completely abandon her positive campaign and continue to hammer away at Obama."
Nope she wants everyone to hate Obama.
"Twas unfortunate She drank an insipid Canadian Liquor, and not the noble Highland Spirits."
Fun with drinking (and commenters).
What's the most amazing thing about this New York Magazine article, "The Feminist Reawakening: Hillary Clinton and the fourth wave"?
Don't talk about the elephant in the room.
When Obama wrote "It was into my father's image ... that I'd packed all the attributes I sought in myself," was he talking about socialism?
The link Prof. Althouse provides seems to say so. Read the whole thing.
A sentence about French President Nicolas Sarkozy and American presidential candidate Barack Obama.
Wherein Prof. Althouse uncovers the NYTimes plot to undermine the Obama candidacy by furthering a negative Obama narrative.
Shots and beer.
Because we should pick a President based on who we would rather drink with. Maybe instead of debates the candidates can play beer pong or quarters.
Tuesday, June 3, 2008
"Well, he's not running for sociologist in chief, he's running for president."
When Shrum and Carville are your defenders, you are screwed.
The "Compassion Forum."
A twofer: bland and tired.
Labels:
bitter,
Clinton Neutral,
Obama neutral,
Wright
"Phony, academic-sounding verbal junk... trying to talk like effete characters from Victorian novels...."
I would like to link to this uncritically.
"So Indiana may end up being the tiebreaker."
Is Obama a leftist or just inexperienced? Prof. Althouse puzzles through this question with the help of the balanced panel of John Hinderacker, Ed Morissey, Glenn Reynolds and Mickey Kaus (whose piece she particularly likes).
"'How many angels dance on the head of the pin?,' she responded, continuing to giggle."
Calling it a cackle doesn't seem positive but what else do you call it?
Oh, no!
It's as easy to rank as American Idol. 1. McCain 2. Obama 3. Clinton
Labels:
Clinton Negative,
McCain Positive,
Obama neutral
McCain at a loss for words...
McCain reminds me of Tim Conway in that clip. Good thing I don't have to remain neutral
Appearing with Elton John, Hillary Clinton proclaims "I’m still standing."
But does she "have" standing.
The Senate hearing on Iraq.
Summaries are rarely neutral. Prof. Althouse did not include a label including Obama though he is in the clip. Don't know what to make of that.
Labels:
Clinton Neutral,
Iraq,
McCain Neutral,
Obama ignored,
youtube
"Well, I think it's given him a lot of depth and a broadness of view."
I am big enough not to pronounce this Obama negative.
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
"It's Barney the purple dinosaur's speech at the next Bloomberg Nonpartisanship Symposium."
Kaus no le gusta el nuevo anuncio de John McCain.
Unless square is a compliment, this is negative toward John McCain. It is interesting that the ad in question has been removed from youtube.
Unless square is a compliment, this is negative toward John McCain. It is interesting that the ad in question has been removed from youtube.
"Clinton and her husband, Bill Clinton, were furious with Penn..."
Clinton fires a top campaign adviser because he is (basically) a lobbyist (Penn) and takes a position different than her's. We will see if Prof. Althouse similarly comments on the ouster of lobbyists from other campaigns.
"What I've also said is: I will always listen to the commanders on the ground."
"The Republican National Committee releases an effective video juxtaposing statements about Iraq by General Petraeus, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama." Sounds bad for Clinton and Obama.
Labels:
Clinton Negative,
Iraq,
Obama negative,
youtube
McCain is "implicitly attacking Obama for basking in self-glory, when the Obama campaign is very much predicated on 'we' and not 'I.'"
Prof. Althouse links to a Bloggingheads episode featuring Bill Scher (liberal) and Conn Carroll (Heritage Foundation) discussing a McCain ad. Prof. Althouse doesn't like the criticism of McCain's ad whether they are from the liberal side or the conservative side. Obama on the other hand has devised "a magnificent, marketable political persona."
Labels:
McCain Positive,
Obama negative,
the internets
"On one day in Canada, he made $475,000 for two speeches, more than double his annual salary as president."
A few years ago, that line would have elicited from me: "Sure he $475,000 in Canadian money but that is worth a lot less in real money." Today, that comment would even be stupider and less funny on so many levels.
Air America suspends Randi Rhodes for using nasty language not on her show, but in a comedy performance.
Randi Rhodes insults Clinton. Prof. Althouse insults Air America.
Hillary as Obama's benefactor?
Prof. Althouse links to Maureen Dowd piece regarding whether Clinton is helping Obama's candidacy in the long run.
John McCain gets back at David Letterman.
The Redlasso link didn't work so Prof. Althouse replaced it with a youtube clip.
I said it 3 days ago, and now Hillary is saying it: Hillary is Rocky.
Is there anything more fun than saying you are right? Key takeaway: Obama can't bowl.
Labels:
Clinton Neutral,
Obama neutral,
sports,
youtube
"I don’t want them punished with a baby."
Obama tries to discuss discussing sex with one's children. Always uncomfortable. Better to just ignore it and hope for the best!
McCain ad labels him — literally — Episcopal.
"With all this trouble Barack Obama has been having with his connection or seeming connection to religion that either is or seems extremist, wouldn't this be a good time to remind folks that John McCain's religion is the most mild-mannered Christianity: Episcopalian?" Sure, if you want to take one of the central points ("I will not lie") of McCain's ad and make it a lie.
Prof. Althouse is less effusive in her praise of this McCain ad but takes the opportunity suggest the real reason behind the ad is Jeremiah Wright.
I didn't see that connection. Personally, I think the ad was designed by an Obama operative to reinforce the fact that McCain is old. Black and white photos (I love black and white photos but these look like they are black and white because they are old photos not because of an aesthetic choice). A formerly youthful McCain in a football uniform which looks like it is from the period where they didn't wear helmets. Ted Williams? I love Ted Williams. Ted Williams definitively is an American hero but I doubt that half of American men under the age of 40 can tell you why off the top of their head. I bet more people under the age of 40 vaguely remember that there was a family feud when he died about whether or not he should be cryogenically frozen. Yes, rock stars can be our heroes but I won't show you a picture of one because (1) I can't find one who agrees with my policies and/or (2) I can't find one who you will recognize who belongs in the group photo with the other heroes.
New McCain slogan: "I will not cheat." (Except on my first wife and maybe on my second.
Prof. Althouse is less effusive in her praise of this McCain ad but takes the opportunity suggest the real reason behind the ad is Jeremiah Wright.
I didn't see that connection. Personally, I think the ad was designed by an Obama operative to reinforce the fact that McCain is old. Black and white photos (I love black and white photos but these look like they are black and white because they are old photos not because of an aesthetic choice). A formerly youthful McCain in a football uniform which looks like it is from the period where they didn't wear helmets. Ted Williams? I love Ted Williams. Ted Williams definitively is an American hero but I doubt that half of American men under the age of 40 can tell you why off the top of their head. I bet more people under the age of 40 vaguely remember that there was a family feud when he died about whether or not he should be cryogenically frozen. Yes, rock stars can be our heroes but I won't show you a picture of one because (1) I can't find one who agrees with my policies and/or (2) I can't find one who you will recognize who belongs in the group photo with the other heroes.
New McCain slogan: "I will not cheat." (Except on my first wife and maybe on my second.
Labels:
McCain Neutral,
Obama neutral,
sports,
Wright
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
March Monthly Total
Here is the summary for March:
Clinton Negative (3)
Clinton Neutral (39)
Clinton Positive (2)
McCain Neutral (9)
McCain Positive (3)
[The 3 McCain positives did appear more driven by aesthetics: here, here, and here.]
Obama negative (9)
Obama neutral (50)
Obama Positive (2)
[The Obama positives were very marginally positive: here and here.]
Wright (14)
Clinton Negative (3)
Clinton Neutral (39)
Clinton Positive (2)
McCain Neutral (9)
McCain Positive (3)
[The 3 McCain positives did appear more driven by aesthetics: here, here, and here.]
Obama negative (9)
Obama neutral (50)
Obama Positive (2)
[The Obama positives were very marginally positive: here and here.]
Wright (14)
"There is no repentance on the part of The New York Times. There is no integrity when it comes to The Times."
Twofer!!! Prof. Althouse links to Capt. Ed who gets to bag on both Wright and the NY Times.
Prof. Althouse is neutral on Obama but goodness can I please get some more links to something that looks bad for Obama?
Prof. Althouse is neutral on Obama but goodness can I please get some more links to something that looks bad for Obama?
Was Barack Obama a "law professor"?
More importantly, if a tree fell in the woods and nobody was there to hear it, would it make a sound? Not sure what I am supposed to think.
Labels:
Clinton Neutral,
law professors,
Obama neutral
All this talk about Al Gore as a compromise candidate...
Prof. Althouse wonders what the heck all the talk about Al Gore is.
I am giving this an "Obama positive" because she says that Obama is taking the appropriate stance but I think it is very close to neutral.
I am giving this an "Obama positive" because she says that Obama is taking the appropriate stance but I think it is very close to neutral.
Labels:
ambiguity,
Clinton Neutral,
Gore,
Obama Positive
"Don’t listen to people when they tell you not to run anymore. That’s just political bigotry."
Because Clinton can not get better advice than people who heldped defeat Al Gore in 2000.
According to Newsweek, "it's only fair to conclude" that the Obama campaign is not trying to flip Texas county convention delegates.
A Newsweek blogger looks into the Texas democratic primary process. Prof. Althouse thinks the piece plays and fast and loose with the facts as she knows them. negative toward the media, not as clear on the candidate.
Mickey's Unified Obama Theory.
Tengo una teorÃa unificada que Kaus piensa que Obama lo forzará a hablar español.
Professor Althouse links without comment to a negative review of Obama's performance by Kaus.
Professor Althouse links without comment to a negative review of Obama's performance by Kaus.
"The idea here, which McCain can’t say, but I can, is to essentially kill the U.N."
Prof. Althouse links to this "Think Progress" post about Krauthammer's interpretation of what McCain means by a new League of Nations Democracies.
Let's see, linking to a lefty site talking about a conservative commentator talking about the Republican nominee . . .
Let's see, linking to a lefty site talking about a conservative commentator talking about the Republican nominee . . .
Labels:
Krauthammer,
McCain Neutral,
media,
the internets
"We can't let them win more delegates just by not telling us when the convention is!" — more Texas county convention maneuvering.
Prof. Althouse publishes an "alarming" email exchange from her son Chris. Apparently a nefarious Obama Delegation Chair failed to keep Chris in the loop on the caucus process.
I wonder if all Clinton Delegation Chairs fully communicated with Obama delegates? I bet so, because a Clinton would never play fast and loose with the rules.
How incompetent is the Clinton campaign? She consistently lets herself be out maneuvered in the caucus process by the junior senator from Illinois.
As an aside, while I do think there are some serious problems with the caucus process, there is some value in it as well. I suspect (though I am not certain) that the process produces more people who will actually work for the campaign than the primary. Anyone can take an hour or so to vote but if you are going to "waste" 12 hours on a decent spring Saturday in Austin, you probably are more likely to actually commit to doing certain things (e.g. phone banking, canvassing) that the party will need in the fall.
I wonder if all Clinton Delegation Chairs fully communicated with Obama delegates? I bet so, because a Clinton would never play fast and loose with the rules.
How incompetent is the Clinton campaign? She consistently lets herself be out maneuvered in the caucus process by the junior senator from Illinois.
As an aside, while I do think there are some serious problems with the caucus process, there is some value in it as well. I suspect (though I am not certain) that the process produces more people who will actually work for the campaign than the primary. Anyone can take an hour or so to vote but if you are going to "waste" 12 hours on a decent spring Saturday in Austin, you probably are more likely to actually commit to doing certain things (e.g. phone banking, canvassing) that the party will need in the fall.
"George Bush called this the ownership society, but what he really meant was 'you're-on-your-own' society."
Pithy could be a compliment or an insult.
Fraud in Texas? "It looks like there was data entry error. You ended up being coded as BOTH a Hillary Clinton and a Barack Obama delegate."
Prof. Althouse updates her readers on the Texas caucus process and her son Chris' experience with it. It is clear that they both aren't buying the Obama campaign's explanation that it was an innocent mistake but I can't say she is explicitly negative toward the candidate.
As an aside, how incompetent is the Clinton campaign? Apparently some of "her" delegates are getting literature from Obama but not from her campaign. That is really incompetent.
As an aside, how incompetent is the Clinton campaign? Apparently some of "her" delegates are getting literature from Obama but not from her campaign. That is really incompetent.
"I don't understand why in this industry of politics, I am an airhead."
It makes John McCain better, doesn't it?
Ramussen poll says 22% of Democrats think Clinton should drop out... and 22% say Obama should drop out.
It is a link to Drudge (which just goes to the basic Drudge site and therefore, lost in the internet {or to his archives [if he has them] which I am not going to search}).
Can a link to Drudge be neutral? I'll tentatively say, yes.
Can a link to Drudge be neutral? I'll tentatively say, yes.
In Texas, the Obama campaign tries to win over Clinton's county convention delegates.
I get the sense that Prof. Althouse's son (Chris) is negative towards the Obama campaign because he believes they are trying to poach (my word, not his or hers) some Texas delegates during the state caucus process. I don't believe that Prof. Althouse is being particularly negative about Obama. Prof. Althouse says: "I don't think the Obama campaign is doing something wrong, but this mailing shows that the Obama campaign is fighting to flip Clinton delegates in Texas. Is Clinton doing the same thing and will some delegates slip away?"
What has been surprising to me throughout this process is how unable, or inept or unwilling the Clinton campaign has been at participating in the caucus process in Texas and elsewhere.
What has been surprising to me throughout this process is how unable, or inept or unwilling the Clinton campaign has been at participating in the caucus process in Texas and elsewhere.
Thomas Sowell puts Barack Obama's association with Jeremiah Wright into a larger context.
Prof. Althouse tries to remain neutral on the Wright matter. But most (all?) of the people she links to seem to put the relationship in a negative context for Obama.
What will Hillary Clinton put us through for that 5% chance she has of winning the nomination?
Speaking from the future I will say: quite a bit.
Prof. Althouse links to a David Brooks piece suggesting that Clinton should get out of the democratic primary race and suggesting that Clinton's failure to do so represents a certain sort of selfishness. Prof. Althouse defends the Clinton position for staying in (while not defending the candidate).
In the post, Prof. Althouse also links to two bloggers who want Clinton to stay in but for different reasons.
Prof. Althouse suggests that "Obama's problem with Jeremiah Wright is something important about him that we need to think through" which is different than saying "the association with Jeremiah Wright should trouble us.
Prof. Althouse links to a David Brooks piece suggesting that Clinton should get out of the democratic primary race and suggesting that Clinton's failure to do so represents a certain sort of selfishness. Prof. Althouse defends the Clinton position for staying in (while not defending the candidate).
In the post, Prof. Althouse also links to two bloggers who want Clinton to stay in but for different reasons.
Prof. Althouse suggests that "Obama's problem with Jeremiah Wright is something important about him that we need to think through" which is different than saying "the association with Jeremiah Wright should trouble us.
Labels:
Brooks,
Clinton Neutral,
Obama neutral,
Wright
"If you think Jeremiah Wright is gruesome..."
Prof. Althouse links to a Hithcens piece where he points out that in addition to Wright, there is another abhorrent pastor linked to Obama. This pastor "has been an Obama supporter, and his church has been an occasional recipient of Obama's patronage."
Now, as I pointed out in a comment at Prof. Althouse's site, the professor is going to blog about whatever she is interested in. Further, I understand (and appreciate) her desire to keep blog posts shorter whenever possible. That said, the paragraph that she quoted from Hitchens' piece continues (without being quoted by Prof. Althouse):
Now, as I pointed out in a comment at Prof. Althouse's site, the professor is going to blog about whatever she is interested in. Further, I understand (and appreciate) her desire to keep blog posts shorter whenever possible. That said, the paragraph that she quoted from Hitchens' piece continues (without being quoted by Prof. Althouse):
"Meanwhile, the Republican nominee adorns himself with two further reverends: one named John Hagee, who thinks that the pope is the Antichrist, and another named Rod Parsley, who has declared that the United States has a mission to obliterate Islam. Is it conceivable that such repellent dolts would be allowed into public life if they were not in tax-free clerical garb? How true it is that religion poisons everything."
Sunday, May 25, 2008
Bayh's test: Which candidate won the states with the most electoral votes?
Wherein a Clinton supporter puts forth an argument favoring Clinton. I'd be almost as surprised if an Obama supporter offered up an argument in favor of Obama.
Labels:
Bayh,
Clinton Neutral,
Obama neutral,
process
Saturday, May 24, 2008
Is the Hillary-Obama fight wrecking the Democratic Party?
Beats me, but I suspect that morphed photo will keep me up at nights.
Doug Kmiec, conservative lawprof, counsel to conservative presidents, endorses Barack Obama.
Doug Kmiec does not appear to be neutral, but Prof. Althouse does.
Labels:
Kmiec,
law professors,
Obama neutral,
the internets
"I'm used to Greenwald misrepresenting me wholesale, but being savaged for a post I didn't link to is a new one."
I don't know where Prof. Althouse stands on the Wright matter. Maybe just bored with it at this point.
Labels:
Blogging about blogging,
Obama neutral,
the internets,
Wright
Rainin' McCain, trickin' lefties.
McCain supporters go after the gay vote on youtube. (Boy that one Weathergirl did not age gracefully. Though I am glad they were able to lose some weight.)
"Mr. Richardson’s endorsement came right around the anniversary of the day when Judas sold out for 30 pieces of silver..."
It's like ten thousand spoons when all you need is a knife.
"How do you rate Obama’s speech? Excellent, good, fair, or poor?"
Must talk about the Obama race speech more. It's a failure.
"An aide to John McCain was suspended from the campaign today for blasting out an inflammatory video...."
A McCain campaign aide pushes the envelope on race (and gets "suspended"). Prof. Althouse hopes the McCain camp steers clear of such games. My guess is that the campaign will avoid that game, but others won't and McCain will sit there and say "hey what am I supposed to do." We will see how believable he is.
A couple of idiosyncratic asides. If you really want to piss off middle class white guys by playing this song, don't just play the refrain. Drop the lyrics (from about 2:30):
Elvis was a hero to most
But he never meant shit to me
Straight up racist that sucker was
Simple and plain
Motherfuck him and John Wayne
Finally, I am still amazed that people who call themselves "conservative" are more interested in using Malcolm X as a boogeyman to scare white folks than they are in using Malcolm X's words to convert others to their way of thinking. There is much in his speeches that will resonate with conservatives.
A couple of idiosyncratic asides. If you really want to piss off middle class white guys by playing this song, don't just play the refrain. Drop the lyrics (from about 2:30):
Elvis was a hero to most
But he never meant shit to me
Straight up racist that sucker was
Simple and plain
Motherfuck him and John Wayne
Finally, I am still amazed that people who call themselves "conservative" are more interested in using Malcolm X as a boogeyman to scare white folks than they are in using Malcolm X's words to convert others to their way of thinking. There is much in his speeches that will resonate with conservatives.
Labels:
McCain Neutral,
Obama neutral,
spouses,
Wright
Mickey Kaus on the Obama speech: "I thought it was a disaster for him."
Aquà aprendemos que Mickey Kaus entiende bien el pensamiento de "non-college-educated white male voters, especially in Pennsylvania".
Good luck finding anything interesting in the newly released Hillary Clinton records.
A different take on Hillary Clinton's experience than this take.
Friday, May 23, 2008
Should the Democratic Party hold a caucus of the superdelegates?
Caucuses suck but a caucus of superdelegates, that would rock.
"I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother."
Prof. Althouse links and writes (at some length for her) about the "big" Obama speech on Wright and race. On the whole it is neutral but she does link to this Mickey Kaus piece where "Mickey Kaus does a terrific job of identifying many of the contradictions you weren't supposed to notice." Unfortunately, because Kaus now is forced by his Latino overlords to write exclusively in Spanish, I was unable to read it.
A "yoga-practicing, public-radio-listening, Wrigley Field-visiting, Wes Anderson-movie-watching, Arrested Development-championing white dude"...
Apparently white Obamatons like Obama so they hate blogs about things that white people like. Immediately I suspect that Prof. Althouse will refer to McCain supporters as "McCainiacs" in her next post.
Unlike Republicans, Democrats are neglecting to rewire our neural links.
My neural pathways are clogged.
"But that's what makes Obama's association with Wright so significant. He's not from Alabama."
Bill Clinton says: "Celebrate!"
Fretting? Not so much. Bored? You bet. Clinton is duplicitous in what he says but he is not the candidate.
"We are the ones we've been waiting for."
I am sure Prof. Althouse has an opinion about Obama's slightly odd phrase. I just don't know what it is.
So, for "Meet the Press" this week, how about an Obama supporter and a Clinton supporter?
Obama supporter wipes the floor with Clinton supporter on "Meet The Press". Talk about misogyny (if I could use footnotes like the cool kids, I would footnote that I am kidding about the misogyny1).
Not Funny: There is nothing funny about misogyny. But Prof. Althouse is often accused of it (or at least of having commenters who espouse it).
Not Funny: There is nothing funny about misogyny. But Prof. Althouse is often accused of it (or at least of having commenters who espouse it).
Hillary Clinton wants the Democratic Party to check into the irregulaties in the Texas caucuses.
Caucuses suck. My theory on Prof. Althouse's hostility to caucus is that her son is involved and he thinks his side is getting screwed. Of course it could be because his side is getting screwed and he is actually able to give her insight into that.
Prof. Althouse's evolution on the Wright controversy interests me. She was late to the party and apparently didn't think much of it initially, (her first post on the subject was the first time I gave a "Obama Positive" rating), then she received an email in the middle of the night from one of her favorite commenters, then she derided Obama's explanation of the relationship and how he sought to move on. Now "the association with Jeremiah Wright should trouble us." (italics in original)
Prof. Althouse's evolution on the Wright controversy interests me. She was late to the party and apparently didn't think much of it initially, (her first post on the subject was the first time I gave a "Obama Positive" rating), then she received an email in the middle of the night from one of her favorite commenters, then she derided Obama's explanation of the relationship and how he sought to move on. Now "the association with Jeremiah Wright should trouble us." (italics in original)
Labels:
Clinton Positive,
Kerfuffle,
Obama negative,
Wright
"There once were two cats of Kilkenny/Each thought there was one cat too many..."
When I clicked on the link for the postit went to the generic Newsweek page. Perhaps the point is lost in the internets.
Labels:
Clinton Neutral,
Obama neutral,
the internets
Race and religion, Barack Obama and Clarence Thomas.
Prof. Althouse quotes at length from an email from an email from one of her most favored commenters. The commenter is not an Obama fan and (at least to me) that comes through in the email. It doesn't mean that Prof. Althouse is negative on Obama (though I have a hard time seeing her giving a pro-Obama email from a commenter similar prominence with so little comment {in large part I don't know that there are any pro-Obama commenters who are in her good graces).
Labels:
commenters,
Kerfuffle,
Obama neutral,
Wright
Lawprof Patricia Williams is giving a talk called "Moaning in America."
Barack Obama responds to the criticism over Jeremiah Wright.
Prof. Althouse wades belatedly into the fray. Isn't that enough?
"I am sorry if anyone was offended. It was certainly not meant in any way to be offensive. We can be proud of both Jesse Jackson and Senator Obama."
We do know how Prof. Althouse loves the language of apologies.
Will Geraldine Ferraro ever leave? My guess is not until late May.
Will Geraldine Ferraro ever leave? My guess is not until late May.
Labels:
Clinton Negative,
fun with language,
Obama neutral
Mickey says...
"The Obama campaign is attacking me to hurt you. I won't let that happen," says Geraldine Ferraro.
Geraldine Ferraro resigns from the Clinton campaign. Prof. Althouse views the tit for tat (can I say tit on this blog?) as a bit childish. But, hey, every junior high needs a class president.
"Would I want Hillary answering the red phone in the middle of the night? No, bloody not."
Prof. Althouse reviews Camille Paglia's tome on the Clinton "3 a.m." ad. Most of what Paglia says is not favorable to Clinton. Prof. Althouse injects that Paglia "says it very well." While some might see this as agreement (thereby necessitating a dreaded "Clinton Negative" rating) I don't. It is perfectly ok to recognize that a writer writes something well or makes a good argument without signing onto that argument.
"Saying that Hillary has Executive Branch experience is like saying Yoko Ono was a Beatle."
Prof. Althouse sorta kinda defends Hillary Clinton on the experience factor.
Mitt Romney says he'd be "honored" to serve as Vice President to John McCain.
Time to talk about possible republican vice president candidates. I vaguely recall that Professor Althouse has some fondness for Romney (who knows, maybe it is contempt and I am misremembering) but it does not infect the cruel neutrality.
Why so much talk about Silda standing by her man Eliot? It is really about Hillary and Bill?
The media is talking about Spitzer's wife. The inevitable comparisons come up about Bill and Hillary Clinton. Prof. Althouse concludes (I think) that the Washington Post piece paints Hillary Clinton in a negative light because of the comparison. But criticism of the media is not criticism of the candidate.
"The further backward you look, the further forward you can see."
Polls close in Mississippi and they say Obama's winning.
The Mississippi polls close and Prof. Althouse also talks about Geraldine Ferraro telling us how lucky Barack Obama is to be a black man and not a white woman. The professor does not seem to find Ms. Ferraro's argument persuasive but doesn't appear to blame the candidate (in this case Clinton) for the comments.
Harvard sociology prof Orlando Patterson sees racism in Hillary's 3 a.m. ad.
Prof. Althouse links to a piece by Harvard sociology professor talking about race in the primary race.
Wednesday, May 21, 2008
Eliot and Hillary.
Pondering the implications of the Spitzer hooker scandal on Hillary Clinton. On the one hand Prof. Althouse is neutral and on the other hand she is neutral.
John McCain and Barack Obama: "Each sees the other as a posturing phony."
Prof. Althouse links to a Michael Crowley piece about what Obama and McCain think of each other. Offers little opinion except on Crowley's use of mild language.
Labels:
fun with language,
McCain Neutral,
media,
Obama neutral
Those chaotic caucuses. (Just another opportunity for Hillary to be sleazy?)
Prof. Althouse blogs about the chaotic Texas caucus process and takes issue with Josh Marshall for his pro-Obama/Anti-Clinton rhetoric.
"TPM Cuts Female Writer Not Making Case for Obama."
Prof. Althouse considers some inside baseball argument from over at TPM.
"But if you use the word pal — or worse, the phrase my friend — in my kitchen, it'll make people paranoid. My friend famously means 'asshole'...."
Prof. Althouse wonders about all of John McCain's "friends".
And I was just going to call attention to the Daily News headline...
Prof. Althouse shows us pictures from a NY newsstand and some NYC architecture.
What exactly did the Democratic candidates pledge with respect to Michigan and Florida?
Prof. Althouse links to Jeralynn Merritt who thinks the delegates should be seated "as is".
Monsters and demons.
Prof. Althouse reviews part of Bernstein's book on Clinton ("A woman in charge"). She specifically focuses on the period when Clinton was trying to push Hillarycare (Prof. Althouse does not call it that) and notes how Clinton "demonized" opponents. Just politics but it sure isn't neutral.
What I think of the "SNL" spoof of Hillary's "3 a.m." ad.
I read what Prof. Althouse wrote about the SNL parody. I think I understand what she thinks about the parody but it tells me little about how she views the candidates.
Obama wins the Wyoming caucuses.
The results for Obama are positive from Wyoming but Prof. Althouse's post is neutral.
Why did Obama let Clinton jerk him around over Samantha Power?
Prof. Althouse criticizes Obama for his deficiencies in his handling of the Samantha Power incident. She calls Obama cowardly.
Professor Althouse also says it is "revolting and ridiculous [for] Clinton campaign hacks [to] pretend it's a giant outrage that the brilliant Samantha Power applied the word 'monster' to Hillary Clinton." Should this be considered "negative" toward Clinton? I am calling it neutral because (a) it is about the hacks and no about the candidate and (b) it is largely about the process of getting elected. Similarly, her comment about Clinton doing whatever it takes to win.
Professor Althouse also says it is "revolting and ridiculous [for] Clinton campaign hacks [to] pretend it's a giant outrage that the brilliant Samantha Power applied the word 'monster' to Hillary Clinton." Should this be considered "negative" toward Clinton? I am calling it neutral because (a) it is about the hacks and no about the candidate and (b) it is largely about the process of getting elected. Similarly, her comment about Clinton doing whatever it takes to win.
"McCain flips out..."
Prof. questions Josh Marshall's word choice.
Labels:
fun with language,
McCain Neutral,
the internets
Let's talk about the new McCain ad.
Prof. Althouse gushes about one of the first (perhaps the first) McCain ad for the general.
She takes a sidetrack by discussing Michelle Obama and her being proud of America. I don't think Prof. Althouse buys this criticism of Mrs. Obama and, even if she did, I don't necessarily think criticism of the spouse is criticism of the candidate.
She takes a sidetrack by discussing Michelle Obama and her being proud of America. I don't think Prof. Althouse buys this criticism of Mrs. Obama and, even if she did, I don't necessarily think criticism of the spouse is criticism of the candidate.
Tuesday, May 20, 2008
"She is a monster, too - that is off the record - she is stooping to anything."
Prof. Althouse discusses Samantha Power leaving/being dismissed from the Obama campaign.
Prof. Althouse opines that "Obama deserves criticism for letting Clinton make something out of nothing and not standing up for Power."
Prof. Althouse opines that "Obama deserves criticism for letting Clinton make something out of nothing and not standing up for Power."
Friday, May 16, 2008
"Does anyone want this nut answering the phone?"
Prof. Althouse links, without comment, to a Larry David piece at the HuffPo which is humourously critical of Clinton. Nothing to suggest that Prof. Althouse signs on to the criticism (other than the fact that I have some vague recollection that Prof. Althouse is somewhat fond of Larry David's comedy or sensibility) nor disagrees with the criticism.
"The battle for the Democratic Party is so bitter because it is a battle over culture."
Prof. Althouse links to an Economist piece about what the difference between Obama and Clinton represents to voters. Some commentary from the professor but nothing too positive or negative.
If you think the superdelegates should support the candidate with the most total votes, do you know whether it is Clinton or Obama?
Prof. Althouse talks about the difference between the popular vote and the delegate count in the Democratic primary.
Why are the results so different in the primary and the caucus in Texas on the same day and what does that mean more generally about caucus results?
Prof. Althouse discusses the primary and (preliminary) caucus results in Texas. She includes some reportage from her son Christopher, who is involved in the process as a Clinton supporter in Texas.
The Texas Democratic Party has a very complicated process to select its delegates. Prof. Althouse points out that Obama did better in the caucus while Clinton did better in the primary. Prof. Althouse highlights the Clinton camp's arguments and does not entertain any other explanation for the discrepancy. The reportage from her son hypothosizes that "much of that difference could be attributable to the shenanigans of Obama's base of fanatics." Sure it could be. It could also be due to any number of other factors.
As luck would have it, I also received a bit of reportage from a Clinton (alternate) delegate in Texas on the night of the primary election. Specifically, my mom. She called me as she was pulling out of the parking lot of her polling place. She never had participated in the caucus process and hadn't really planned to but she voted late on her way home from work and by the time she voted the caucus process was beginning. Someone asked her if she wanted to sign up to be a delegate or an alternate and she basically said what the heck. She didn't stay for the meeting part of the caucus as she had to get home and get dinner.
I would also point out that the Texas primary was at the beginning of Rush Limbaugh's "Operation Chaos". Now, I have no idea what percentage Clinton's primary support came due to Operation Chaos but I am pretty confident that few, if any, participants in Operation Chaos participated in the caucuses.
The Texas Democratic Party has a very complicated process to select its delegates. Prof. Althouse points out that Obama did better in the caucus while Clinton did better in the primary. Prof. Althouse highlights the Clinton camp's arguments and does not entertain any other explanation for the discrepancy. The reportage from her son hypothosizes that "much of that difference could be attributable to the shenanigans of Obama's base of fanatics." Sure it could be. It could also be due to any number of other factors.
As luck would have it, I also received a bit of reportage from a Clinton (alternate) delegate in Texas on the night of the primary election. Specifically, my mom. She called me as she was pulling out of the parking lot of her polling place. She never had participated in the caucus process and hadn't really planned to but she voted late on her way home from work and by the time she voted the caucus process was beginning. Someone asked her if she wanted to sign up to be a delegate or an alternate and she basically said what the heck. She didn't stay for the meeting part of the caucus as she had to get home and get dinner.
I would also point out that the Texas primary was at the beginning of Rush Limbaugh's "Operation Chaos". Now, I have no idea what percentage Clinton's primary support came due to Operation Chaos but I am pretty confident that few, if any, participants in Operation Chaos participated in the caucuses.
"An unassuming foreign country has injected itself into the U.S. presidential race."
Prof. Althouse links to the Canadian NAFTA story. No further commentary from Professor Althouse.
"I don’t think it is fair to suggest somehow that we have been trying to hide the bone on this."
Prof. Althouse links to a story on the Obama/Rezko matter. The post itself is neutral and so that is how I am labeling it.
That said, it will be interesting to see how much Prof. Althouse posts "neutral" posts about matters which are clearly negatives for the other candidates.
That said, it will be interesting to see how much Prof. Althouse posts "neutral" posts about matters which are clearly negatives for the other candidates.
Labels:
fun with language,
Kerfuffle,
Obama neutral,
Rezko
So did you hear the one about how Hillary Clinton's chances of winning the nomination just decreased?
Prof. Althouse discusses the Obama camp's spin after the Ohio primary and the Texas primary/caucus. Doesn't buy the Obama team's analysis but is (to my way of thinking) quite neutral on both Obama and Clinton.
Tuesday, March 4, 2008
"The Audacity of Hate" by Innuendo
Monitoring the Cruel Neutrality
Prof. Althouse has taken a vow of "cruel neutrality" in the presidential election. I think it is great and I wish her the best of luck in the endeavor.
Personally, I couldn't do it. Even if I were to be genuinely neutral, supporters of a candidate or opponents of a candidate are too likely to piss me off and color my neutrality.
At any rate, this is a blog I created to keep track (for myself at least) of Prof. Althouse's vow of neutrality. I make no claims that I will be consistent, fair or neutral.
Personally, I couldn't do it. Even if I were to be genuinely neutral, supporters of a candidate or opponents of a candidate are too likely to piss me off and color my neutrality.
At any rate, this is a blog I created to keep track (for myself at least) of Prof. Althouse's vow of neutrality. I make no claims that I will be consistent, fair or neutral.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)